|
Just when the nation was trying to delve into the relevance of Munnabhai's
gandhigiri, a fresh yet appealing movement emerged; giving a new
perspective to the debate- which way should nation head- the Gandhi
way or the 'other' way. Ace filmmaker Mani Ratnam has tried to define
this 'other way' through his cinematic product- Guru.
 |
Advertisement
 |
|
|
|
|
|
But will the youth go with the director's view? The other day,
we read about thirty families who resort to gandhigiri against a
builder to get their houses back. But wouldn't gurugiri soon replace
gandhigiri as it has all the elements of success and hardwork, goal
orientation and courage, sans principles though.
"Gandhigiri is not just a philosophy, it's a way of life.
It can be never outdated as it works for the people who value justice
more than anything else, no matter how much time it takes. It is
very easy to resort to gurugiri to get your work done but then it
will never let your conscience rest in peace," says Niharika
Rastogi, student
Agrees Chitra Mudgal, Member of Prasar Bharti and Censor Board,
"Though I haven't seen the film yet, but the philosophy of
Guru has greatly perturbed me. The large canvas of the film may
fascinate common people for a while but ultimately it will fail
to influence them as this school of thought lacks in spirit."
Delhi University Reader Alok Puranik is happy with the new way
of life that the film has introduced. "Why shouldn't youth
dream? Gurugiri is most relevant in the era of globalisation. What
would an ordinary person do when he has to surpass the webs of bureaucracy?
"Either he has to wait for a miracle to happen or find a solution
to break through the system. The latter is much practical option.
Guru finds a smart solution to his problem when he is not permitted
even a chance to compete. He is a perfect portrayal and solution
to youth's problem. He is teaching them not to manipulate things
for his selfish ends but benefiting plenty of other people in the
process", adds Alok Puranik
But what about the moral and social issues? Aren't we responsible
to our society? "A businessman cannot think of reforms because
he is no social activist. Medha Patkar may have been successfully
fought for the causes she believes in but had she forayed in business,
she might not have been successful. We can never mix and confuse
two separate issues."
He adds: "Gurubhai has dreamt of something that was much ahead
of the time. Today, licensing policies have undergone a major change.
At that time they were different. For fulfilling his dreams he had
to forgo the rules that were baseless and just coming in his way
of progress."
Shrish Dobhal who played the role of Bapu in DD's short film Mahatma
and two other serials Baat Bapu ki and Goonj Anugoonj feels that
the optimum implementation of both the philosophies could reap rich
benefits to youth as he put in: "As far as public issues are
concerned, Gandhigiri is the perfect way to voice your concern,
but it gets tough when an individual stands alone for his own problem.
It's better that you give punch to a person who slaps you on one
cheek in that case."
|